Solutions / Themis

Every fact points to its source.

Themis is a case workspace for lawyers and investigators. It turns statements, messages and hours of footage into one sourced record of the case. The AI proposes, and a person decides.

Built for
Criminal defence · Civil litigation · Investigators
Languages
English · සිංහල · தமிழ்
Data
Encrypted, local-first, works offline
Status
Validating with practitioners

Interface concept with a fictional case. Themis is in validation.

The problem

Evidence piles up faster than people can review it.

Cases are still built by hand, in spreadsheets and word documents, and the AI tools that promise to help can't be trusted to quote accurately.

90%

of practitioners build case chronologies in Excel or Word, where source links get lost.

17–33%

of answers from leading legal AI tools were hallucinated in an independent test.

607 h

of CCTV in one Sri Lankan case: about ten months of lab time, cut to four hours by a court.

5 of 12

staff positions filled in the Government Analyst's digital section.

Sources: legal-technology vendor chronology survey; Stanford RegLab/HAI study of legal AI research tools; Sri Lankan court and Auditor General reporting.

The product

One sourced record. Every view generated from it.

The timeline, the contradictions, the court bundle: each is a view over the same record, so a correction made once shows up everywhere.

Every fact sourced

Each fact, date and quote points to the exact passage it came from.

Living timeline

A chronology built from documents, messages and footage, with camera clocks corrected.

Contradictions and gaps

Flags where accounts disagree and where proof is missing.

Visual evidence

Upload images and video, label people and objects, and follow them across cameras.

Ask the case

Plain-language search in Sinhala, Tamil or English pulls up the right moments and passages.

Court-ready output

Bundles, schedules and reports in the court's format, with the method attached.

Built to be trusted

The AI proposes. A mechanism checks. A person decides.

  1. 01 · AIProposes

    Suggests facts, dates and links, always with the passage it read.

  2. 02 · MechanismChecks

    Rejects any quote that doesn't match the source word for word.

  3. 03 · PersonDecides

    Only what a lawyer or investigator accepts enters the record.

Verified, not trusted

Every quote must match the source exactly before it's shown. Nothing enters the record until a person accepts it.

Client data stays local

An encrypted vault on the user's own machine that works offline. A file leaves only when the user chooses an AI action that needs it.

Face matching gives leads, not answers

Off by default, limited to the user's own case, and needing a second reviewer and corroboration before anything is exported.

Never offered

Open-web face search, image scraping or live-feed identification. Wrongful arrests show why.

Roadmap

Validate first, then build in phases.

We're talking to lawyers and investigators in Sri Lanka before writing the first line of product code. Their answers decide what ships first.

  1. Now

    Validate

    Interviews with practitioners, language and video tests, legal review.

  2. Phase 1

    Solo vault

    Sourced facts, the timeline, media upload and labels.

  3. Phase 2

    Intelligence

    Detection, tracking and Ask the case.

  4. Phase 3

    Teams

    Team sync, cross-camera tracking and face matching.

  5. Phase 4

    Scale

    Institutions and more jurisdictions.

Research interviews

Build cases for a living? Help shape Themis.

We're interviewing criminal defence lawyers, civil litigators and investigators. Thirty minutes of your time shapes what we build, and you'll be first to try it.